Let me preface this with saying that if you look at the track record of the Heterosexist Dominionist Theocratic Fundamentalists you'll see a steady attack on young people. From their attempts to rid schools of gay teachers and Gay-Straight Alliances to now moving to the college setting where institutional policy on respect and tolerance for "all people" is an affront to their free speech rights.
The story below links to the American Family Association's Agape Press, which outlines their displeasure.
Radical right angry that colleges are promoting "respect [for] the dignity of all persons"
Some of the examples of college academic rules that the religious right is outraged over:
* A ban on "insults, taunts, or challenges directed toward another person" (Appalachian State University).
* A practice of outlawing "statements of intolerance" (North Carolina Central University).
* A requirement that all students "respect the dignity of all persons" and "strive for the openness to learn from differences in people" (UNC Asheville).
* A policy outlawing "disrespect for persons" (UNC Greensboro).
John Aravosis of Americablog asks a great question on this: What exactly are conservative Christian activists promoting that they're afraid of these kind of campus policies?
Yes, what are they afraid of? If there is a respectful debate and discussion in the classroom on hot topics of the day (as there should be on a college campus), what exactly are these folks wanting to say on campus that they are worried will be misconstrued as disrespectful?
Personally, I don't think this has anything to do with free speech as being the only one with the right to speak. Being aware of the college environment, I've seen and heard of conservative students taking offense and even suing professors for not siding with their views. There is even a website for students to report such "violations": Students for Academic Freedom.
USA Today covered this trend and this group:
On about 90 campuses, meanwhile, students have joined Students for Academic Freedom, created four months ago by leftist turned conservative activist David Horowitz. They argue that campuses are overwhelmingly liberal and demand that administrations seek a more balanced point of view among faculty and in programs such as lecture series.
...
Some professors stress that part of their job is to challenge students to question their beliefs. "We're in the business of helping people become critical thinkers," says Shippensburg sociology professor Debra Cornelius. Though she acknowledges her own liberal politics, she says, "We on a daily basis struggle with ... making sure people behave in a tolerant way (without) chilling speech."
...
Conservative students aren't the only ones feeling pinched. In May, Wesleyan University President Douglas Bennet banned a long-standing tradition, particularly popular among gay rights groups, of writing messages in chalk on sidewalks. Some faculty were targeted by name, and increasingly vulgar obscenities, sexual and racial slurs had spurred complaints.
But the most well-oiled attack is driven by conservative and Christian students, "who basically feel they're targets for getting their minds dry-cleaned to think the right way," says Jordan Lorence, a litigator for the Alliance Defense Fund, an Arizona Christian organization involved in several lawsuits.
Is the question about being able to say anything you want as offensively as you want or about civil discourse? If a person wants civil discourse, no problem. Don't worry about the school policies. If you want to harass and offend others, I can see where these folks would want to change policy. When there is no line to distinguish constructive discussion from hate speech, everything is open game.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(465)
-
▼
January
(42)
- The Passing of a Legend
- (Too) Many Wines from a Weekend in New England
- On Alito
- Ironic Follow-up on "The Book of Daniel"
- FL Signature Collectors not Successful
- Latest on Dying Cop's Last Wish
- Political Test
- 2004 Oxford Landing "GSM" (Grenache, Shiraz, Mourv...
- 2001 Domaine Gramenon Cotes du Rhone "Cuvee Lauren...
- A Prayer Answered
- Watching Washington
- Moving Forward in Maryland
- 2003 Chateau de Chatelard Beaujolais-Villages "Vie...
- 2003 Leaping Lizard Napa Valley Zinfandel
- VA Legis. Dropping In-Vitro Bill
- Just Being All-American Boys
- Episode 12: Meet Our Buddy, The Caged Iraqi
- Episode 11: "The Book Of Daniel" - Pillpoppers, J...
- The Fundie's War on our Young People
- Nutcases are not Limited to the South
- So, This is What is Wrong With Nashville
- Winning the Crazy Vote
- At Least Indianapolis is Smart
- And It's Not Just Alabama
- Some Things in Alabama Never Change
- The "Kiddie Table" Benefits Concept
- When Hate Has Nothing Better To Do
- "Brokeback" wins Four at Golden Globes
- Wines from Emma's Birthday Dinner
- Brokeback Mountain-A Review, sort of
- 2001 Zumaya Tempranillo (Ribera del Duero, Spain)
- 2003 Villaroya de la Sierra "IA" Garnacha (Spain)
- 2003 "The Lucky Country" Barossa Valley, Australia...
- They're Talkin Bout Us In The Liberal Media
- Episode 10: God Hates Ariel Sharon, Dick Clark, C...
- Episode 9: Shimmysham The Liberal Dummy
- 2003 Chateau de Pena Cotes du Roussillon Villages ...
- The Endurance of Love, Even in the Face of Death
- Project Resource Tips
- Now "IT" is called Pastoring
- A Good Way to Start the New Year
- 1999 Ferraton Crozes-Hermitage "La Matiniere"
-
▼
January
(42)